The NewStandard ceased publishing on April 27, 2007.

Collective Blog

Weblog HomePage | The NewStandard
The item below is a weblog entry, not a news article. This weblog is unedited, and opinions expressed here are not necessarily those of The NewStandard, which is an edited, hard news website.

November 6, 2006

Project Censored report-back

Last weekend, I attended the first-ever Media Accountability Conference, hosted by the progressive media-research group Project Censored, which publishes an annual compendium of underreported news stories. The group is based out of Sonoma State University in California. Project Censored has been publishing its list of underreported stories for three decades now; and this year, it put on a full event for media makers and activists to rub shoulders and bump heads on a variety of interesting panels.

Just as Project Censored brings together an array of diverse public-interest stories each year, it also welcomed a range of folks to this event, inclusive of the so-called "fringes." The group caused a local stir with the keynote speaker, former Brigham Young University physicist Steven E. Jones, who has publicized controversial findings challenging the official explanation of the collapse of the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001. The next day, the local daily ran a front-page story on Project Censored, poo-pooing their choice to have a "conspiracy theorist" headline their conference. But hey, "if you’re into conspiracy theories" as they like to say, I guess it comes with the territory. (Actually, organizers told attendees, only half jokingly, that they were thrilled about the unprecedented media attention.)

On Saturday, I spoke on a panel about government accountability with Jeff Ruch, executive director of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, a group that TNS has used as source in our coverage over the past few years for its venerable watchdog work.

I gave a rough overview of the overall rising trend in secrecy. That’s a trend that’s difficult to quantify exactly, but easy to discern with what we know about the growing number of decisions to classify documents, the use of the "state secrets" privilege by the White House, and other post-September-11 circumventions around the principle of government transparency.

On Day Two, there was also an insightful talk on underreported yet hiding-in-plain-sight environmental issues. Mother Jones writer Julia Whitty talked about the slow, steady and very public devastation of the world’s ocean habitats through commercial fishing. Eco-activist "Sprocket" of Earth First! explained how a web of corporate interests has let war ravage the Congo in order to feed our addiction to cellular technology.

Various awardees also discussed the "militarization of the homeland" through the increased collusion of the Pentagon with domestic law enforcement; water resource issues and global conflict; the implications of media consolidation for radio, broadcast and Internet communications.

A few of the conversations delved into how the media manipulates public perceptions, sometimes in ways that even self-described media activists may fail to pick up on. In a talk about "genocide" and ongoing wars in the Middle East and Africa, for instance, activist Keith Harmon Snow argued that the crisis in Darfur we’re now starting to read about in the mainstream papers has already been co-opted by the multinational corporations looking to further exploit Africa’s resources. He said that even as humanitarian advocates campaign for more aid to the region, they skirt connection between post-colonial corporate plunder and the so-called "savagery" plastered on the front pages.

It was a lot of ground to cover in 48 hours, and of course, the conference served only to give a cursory view of what different independent journalists and public-interest advocates are working on.

Unfortunately, most of the attendees were already heavily involved with independent media in some form, as activists, journalists or some combination. But the conference was about media accountability – a goal that it not unique to independent or alternative media only. I wish the demographics of the attendees, and their professional involvements, reflected the diversity of the population that this issue impacts.

The most important insight I think we all left with was that ultimately, there are just too many underreported issues and not enough people to report on them. Still, as critical makers and consumers of media increase, the closer we come to realizing a new information system that takes these problems, connects them to a broader public interest, asks the right questions and does them something close to justice.


MarkAdamsAtty: Hard Evidence of Media Bias

Dear Media Reform Activists:

I have been involved in two lawsuits in the last two weeks in Florida in which Luke Lirot, Ellis Rubin, and I tried to get the Reform Party candidate for Governor of Florida, Max Linn, into the debates. We won both cases in the trial court although one decision was immediately reversed by the 4th District Court of Appeals of Florida.

In both cases, the defendants which included the Florida Press Association claimed that the polls show that Mr. Linn only had the support of 1% of voters; however, they did not provide any back up data for their polls and they did not verify the truth and accuracy of their polls. We provided independent polls with all back up data and an affidavit verifying the truth and accuracy of these independent polls which showed that Mr. Linn had 5.5% support from likely voters on September 28 and 8.7% support on October 26.

As a result of these polls and the constitutional issues that we raised, we won both cases. This experience has lead me to question the role of the press as most of you already do. It appears that the consolidation in the press has resulted in an abandonment of the role of the press as envisioned by our founding fathers. While legal action or a change in anti-trust regulations regarding the press may be helpful, public knowledge of the press' bias must be generated first.

Please review an article that I posted on the Florida Politics website about press bias in coverage of the election, and please vote in the poll too at:

Finally, please pass this along to your contacts and post it on blogs which you follow. Thank you for your efforts to inform the public of the need to reform our mainstream press. Please take action again today.

Highest regards,

Mark A. Adams, Esquire JD/MBA

Post a Comment
Subscribe by e-mail to comments on this entry.

The NewStandard ceased publishing on April 27, 2007.