my morning paper advanced search my AliveWire
Independent. Nonprofit. Anticommercial. Uncompromised.
KEEP TNS - JOIN TODAY
KEEP TNS - JOIN TODAY KEEP TNS - JOIN TODAY KEEP TNS - JOIN TODAY KEEP TNS - JOIN TODAY
KEEP TNS - JOIN TODAY
BECOME PREMIUM MEMBER # 642 - SIGN UP NOW!

 

Court OKs Religious Hiring Bias by Federally Backed Charities

by Brendan Coyne (bio)

PAGE TOOLS
send-to-friend
print-friendly version
add to my morning paper
respond to editors / author
increase type size
decrease type size
Sign up to receive NewStandard headlines and extras by e-mail weekday mornings!

Your privacy is strictly respected.

Oct 7 - A federal court in New York took the teeth out of an anti-discrimination lawsuit earlier this week by stating that religious institutions receiving federal money may prejudice their personnel decisions based on the religious beliefs of potential and existing employees, so long as government monies are not used specifically for religion-related activities.

In finding largely for the defendants in Lown v. Salvation Army, US Circuit Court Judge Sidney Stein ruled that, so long as government monies are not used specifically for religion-related activities, they could accept government funding.

The ruling permitted the case to go forward but removed government agencies from the list of defendants.

Judge Stein said the plaintiffs "failed to allege any basis for attributing the Salvation Army’s allegedly discriminatory personnel actions to the government defendants." Additionally, Stein found, a section of the 1964 Civil Rights Act specifically protects religious institutions from bans on other organizations when it comes to faith and hiring practices.

The ruling represents a victory for advocates of increasing the ties between government and Christianity, the Roundtable on Religion and Social Welfare Policy, a non-partisan group seeking to raise awareness of religion in the public arena, noted Tuesday.

The New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU) alleges that the Salvation Army, an evangelical religious charity that receives the vast majority of its funding from government institutions, subjects employees to unlawful religious discrimination. Plaintiffs are seeking action either restricting the Salvation Army from taking religious beliefs into account in personnel matters or barring government agencies from providing the charity with funds.

In February 2004, the NYCLU filed the lawsuit in federal court on behalf of Salvation Army associate director Ann Lown and seventeen fellow employees who felt the charity created an atmosphere of hostility through repeated and pervasive religious proselytizing, according to the rights group. The plaintiffs plan to go ahead with the pared-down suit, according to Tuesday’s statement.

© 2005 The NewStandard. See our reprint policy.


Online sources used in this news brief:

Related reading elsewhere on the Web:


 
middle eat in conflict section
environment and health section
work and money section
civil liberties and security section
election 2004 section
 
 
Worker Layoffs Continue to Rise, May Top 2004 Rates
Student Loan Boycott Demands Slavery Reparations
Mail Carriers Challenging Senator over Postal-reform Hold
ACLU Questions Soundness of Orleans Prison as Inmates Return
Court to Consider New Trial for Abu-Jamal
FBI Database Often Wrong on Immigrants’ Status, Study Finds
Proposed Barriers to Pollution Oversight Alarm Watchdogs, Activists
Junk-food Marketing Out of Control, Report Concludes

The NewStandard Home    The Tour        Contact Us