Recent News
Recent Environment and Health News
My Morning Paper

Court Finds in Favor of Pollution Reporting Rules

by Brendan Coyne

Oct. 27, 2005 – In a victory for public-interest advocates and environmentalists earlier this week, a federal appeals court in New York State ordered the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to follow its own rules and previous precedent when regulating energy plants. The finding forces the Agency to act on federal rules regardless of the actions of other government bodies.

Toolbox
Email to a Friend
Print-friendly Version
Respond
Add to My Morning Paper
daily headlinesSign up to receive NewStandard headlines and extras by e-mail weekday mornings!

Your privacy is strictly respected.

Monday, a three-judge panel of the US Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the EPA acted opposite of the law and Agency precedent when it decided to approve air-pollution-control permits to two New York energy plants despite evidence that both were operating in violation of the Clean Air Act.

As a result of the ruling, the EPA must now go back and review its decision to allow the plant’s owner, NRG, to assess facility emissions in quarterly and half-year reports.

In a press statement, New York Public Interest Group (NYPIRG) policy analyst Jason K. Babbie called the recent court decision a "victory for every American."

"Today’s court decision upholds the government’s responsibility to act quickly to address violations that threaten our health and environment, and requires that the public be included in that process," Babbie said.

The Circuit Court ruled that the EPA must follow its own permitting process and ordered it to review its decision to defer a ruling on the permits until the conclusion of a New York Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) lawsuit against NRG and Niagara Mohawk.

In that separate lawsuit, the DEC is waiting for a court decision over two emissions violations assessed at NRG in 2000.

According to court papers, DEC regulators found the plants, formerly owned by Niagara Mohawk, illegally upgraded facilities to increase output without bringing the aging plants into compliance with modern environmental standards, a direct violation of the 1970 Clean Air Act, which requires companies operating older generators to bring them into compliance with the Act upon expansion.

Promotional Tools
Share this article with the world using these popular services!
NewsTrust del.icio.us Digg NewsVine StumbleUpon Fark BlinkList Furl Ma.gnolia RawSugar Reddit Simpy
Buzzflash.net Spurl TailRank Yahoo! MyWeb Rojo FaceBook Google Bookmarks NowPublic

Last year, NYPIRG filed a federal lawsuit against the EPA after the Agency refused to enforce existing laws against the NRG-run plants in Huntley and Dunkirk. The plants are two of the state’s largest energy providers and polluters, according to state data presented to the court. Together, they put out over one-fifth of New York’s nitrogen oxide and 38 percent of sulfur dioxide emissions.

Send to Friends Respond to Editors or Reporter

Online Sources
  • PDF File - requires Adobe Acrobat - click to obtain Legal Document "NYPIRG v EPA" US Second Circuit Court
  • Press Release "Court Overtunrs EPA’s Refusal to Veto Air Pollution Permits for New York Power Plants" Earthjustice
Brendan Coyne is a contributing journalist.

Recent contributions by Brendan Coyne: more